![]() The latest approval for funding comes from fiscal 2018 foreign military financing and overseas contingency operations accounts ($26.5 million) and from fiscal 2019 foreign military financing funds ($115 million). As a result of the Post’s claim, House Democrats threatened to launch an investigation. Reportedly, a prosecutor previously investigated Biden’s son, who had worked for a Ukrainian energy firm. The situation expanded days later, when The Washington Post’s editorial board wrote that it was “reliably told” the Trump administration suspended the aid to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to relaunch a corruption probe into former Vice President Joe Biden - the front-runner in the Democratic primary to challenge President Donald Trump - and his son. The delay resulted in bipartisan criticism from Congress, where support for Ukraine remains strong. The $250 million become a political flashpoint at the end of August, when reports emerged that the White House requested Defense Secretary Mark Esper and then-national security adviser John Bolton to review that security assistance package. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., later claimed that the Trump administration moved the funds in part because the Whie House was embarrassed Congress was poised to act on the issue. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., indicated that the Defense Department’s funding for Ukraine may also move forward, saying Ukraine is “going to get the money.” An hour later, during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Sen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |